Baxter L, Davies S (2010). Balancing risk and choice in childbirth after caesarean section. British Journal of Midwifery
Bedwell C, Houghton G, Richens Y et al (2011). ‘She can choose, as long as I’m happy with it’: a qualitative study of expectant fathers’ views of birth place. Sexual & reproductive healthcare: official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives 2(2):71-75.
Bick D (2012). Place of birth in England: Still a contentious issue? Midwifery 28(1):1-2.
Biro MA, Knight M, Wallace E (2014). Is place of birth associated with mode of birth? The effect of hospital on caesarean section rates in a public metropolitan health service. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 54(1):64-70.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group (2011). Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ: 343.
Bogdan-Lovis E, de Vries RG (2013). Ethics and the architecture of choice for home and hospital birth. Journal of Clinical Ethics 24(3):192-197.
Brintworth K, Sandall J (2013). What makes a successful home birth service: An examination of the influential elements by review of one service. Midwifery 29(6):713-721.
Brodrick A (2014). Not my choice: results of an online survey. Practising Midwife 17(2):15-17.
Cheyney M, Bovbjerg M, Everson C et al (2014). Outcomes of Care for 16,924 Planned Home births in the United States: The Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 59(1):17-27.
Coxon K, Sandall J, Fulop N (2014). To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourse of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society 16(1):51-67.
Dahlen H, Jackson M, Schmied V et al (2011). Birth centres and the national maternity services review: Response to consumer demand or compromise? Women & Birth 24(4):165-172.
de Jonge A, Stuijt R, Eijke I et al (2014). Continuity of care: what matters to women when they are transferred from primary to secondary care during labour? A qualitative interview study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 14(1):1471-2393.
Demilew J (2005). Home birth in urban UK. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 15(Suppl2):S26-33.
Department of Health (1993). Changing Childbirth. Part 1: report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO.
Department of Health (2007). Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service.London: DH.
Edwards A (2008). Place of birth: can ‘Maternity Matters’ really deliver choice? British Journal of Midwifery 16(12):771-775.
Flynn N (2013). Midwives and mothers walking hand in hand. Practising Midwife 16(4):5.
Gardner S (2012). Informed decision-making. British Journal of Midwifery 20(5):308.
Garrod D (2012). ‘Planned home birth reduces likelihood of caesarean section’. British Journal of Midwifery 20(1):74.
Geerts CC, Klomp T, Lagro-Janssen AL et al (2014). Birth setting, transfer and maternal sense of control: results from the DELIVER study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 14(27):1471-2393.
Goldstein R (2012). Jonah’s Birth. Journal of Perinatal Education 21(3):138-144.
Gordon W (2013). Expert Workshop Assesses the Significance of Birth Location on Maternal and Infant Outcomes. Journal of Perinatal Education 22(3):133-135.
Griffith R (2011). Consent to treatment: the right to decide. British Journal of Midwifery 19(2):123-124.
Hall J (2003). Free-standing maternity units in England. In: Kirkham M ed. Birth Centres: a social model for maternity care. Oxford: Books for Midwives.
Healthcare Commission (2008). Key findings of the 2007 Maternity Services Review. London: Healthcare Commission.
Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D (2012). Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 8.
Hollowell J, Puddicombe D, Rowe R et al (2011). The Birthplace national prospective cohort study: perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth. Birthplace in England research programme. Final report part 4. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme.
Jomeen J (2007). Choice in childbirth: a realistic expectation? British Journal of Midwifery 15(8):485-490.
Kirkham M (2003). Birth Centres: a social model for maternity care. Oxford: Book for Midwives.
Li Y, Townend J, Rowe R et al (2014). The effect of maternal age and planned place of birth on intrapartum outcomes in healthy women with straightforward pregnancies: a secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 4(1):e004026.
Lowdon G (2012). Who makes which decision? AIMS Journal 24(3):7-10.
Maternity Care Working Party (2007). Making normal birth a reality. Consensus statement from the Maternity Care Working Party: our shared views about the need to recognise, facilitate and audit normal birth. London: NCT/RCM/RCOG.
McCutcheon R, Brown D (2012). A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence-Based Midwifery 10(1):23-28.
MIDIRS (2008). Place of birth. Bristol: MIDIRS.18 pages.
Miller S, Skinner J (2012). Are first-time mothers who plan home birth more likely to receive evidence-based care? A comparative study of home and hospital care provided by the same midwives. Birth 39(2):135-144.
Mottram L (2008). First-time expectant fathers and their influence on decision-making regarding choice for place of birth. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 18(4):582-589.
Murray-Davis B, McNiven P, McDonald H et al (2012). Why home birth? A qualitative study exploring women’s decision-making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery 28(5):576-581.
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2007). Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Commissioned by the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).London: RCOG Press.
Regan M, McElroy K (2013). Women’s perceptions of childbirth risk and place of birth. Journal of Clinical Ethics 24(3):239-252.
Rimkoute A, South T (2013). Why VBAC birthplace matters: A literature review. British Journal of Midwifery 21(5):364-370.
Rogers C, Yearley C, Littlehales C (2012). The Birthplace Study: turning the tide of childbirth. British Journal of Midwifery 20(1):28-33.
Rogers I (2009). Freedom of choice in childbirth: women need time to make a decision. British Journal of Midwifery 17(8):509.
Rowe RE, Townend J, Brocklehurst P et al (2013). Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 13(1):224.
Sandall J, McCandlish R, Bick D (2012). Place of birth. Midwifery 28(5):547.
Sanders J (2007). Intrapartum care guidance: putting women first. Practising Midwife 10(10):34-35.
Schroeder E, Petrou S, Patel N et al (2012). Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in women at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ: British Medical Journal : 344.
Singh D, Newburn M (2006). Feathering the nest: what women want from the birth environment. Midwives 9(7):266-269.
Tew M (1998). Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. 3rd ed. London: Free Association Books.
van Haaren-ten Haken T, Hendrix M, Nieuwenhuijze M et al (2012). Preferred place of birth: Characteristics and motives of low-risk nulliparous women in the Netherlands. Midwifery 28(5):609-618.
Walsh D, Downe S (2004). Outcomes of free-standing, midwife-led birth centres: a structured review. Birth 31(3):222-229.
Walton C (2012). The Birthplace in England Study: methods, findings and evaluation. British Journal of Midwifery 20(1):22-27.
Warwick C (2012). Outcomes by planned place of birth: implications of the Birthplace Study. British Journal of Midwifery 20(1):20-21.